JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 11, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Dagoberto Bohorquez Forero

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Súplica Interpuesto Contra El Auto De 21 De Octubre De 2009, Mediante El Cual Se Rechaza La Demanda  En El Proceso De La Referencia, La Sala Advierte Que Ya Se Declaró La Exequibilidad De Las Normas Demandadas, Por Los Mismos Cargos Que En Esta Oportunidad Presentó El Demandante Y Por Lo Tanto Se Esta Ante Cosa Juzgada Constitucional, Se Decide Confirmar El Auto.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Rechazo por cosa juzgada absoluta
  • Recurso de súplica
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR el auto de 21 de octubre de 2009 dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador, Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad, identificada con el numero de radicacion D- 7925, presentada por el ciudadano Dagoberto Bohorquez Forero, contra los articulos 10, 11 y 160 de la Ley 769 de 2002, "Por la cual se expide el Codigo Nacional de Transito Terrestre y se dictan otras disposiciones".
  2. Notifiquese, cumplase, archivese el expediente e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.